<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Business News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://business.techwhack.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://business.techwhack.com</link>
	<description>News and Views from the Business World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:10:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on eBay search went down for a day due to holiday rush by Ric</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5801-ebay-search/comment-page-1#comment-105269</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5801#comment-105269</guid>
		<description>Theories abound as to the cause of the outage.

Was it a listing surge as eBay&#039;s a$$ covering executives want everyone to believe?

Was it a calculated take down designed to conceal the fact that eBay 2009 4th quarter revenue is already in a serious hole?

Did the insertion of Most Watch code to advertise on seller pages bring the systems down with only normal seasonal listing activity?

Did management forget the holiday selling season starts in November and failed to dedicate sufficient capacity?

Did disgruntled former employees hack the site causing the outage?

Bottom line is eBay&#039;s management lacks sufficient credibility to have any explanation offered accepted as truth.

John Donahoe and his deficient management team have spun so many tall tales that nothing they say anymore is accepted at face value.

It appears that the eBay board of directors, media and stock analysts are the only ones that buy into the tall tales spun by John Donahoe &amp; his management team.

eBay&#039;s sales are not down due to the recession as John Donahoe claims. If sales were impacted by the recession, Amazon and a plethora of sites would not be reporting double digit sales increases.

Buyers still do not believe that checks and money orders are insecure methods of payment, and instead have taken their buying activity to other sites.

Buyers have not bought into Donahoe &amp; Co&#039;s declaration that the destructive innovations imposed across eBay have resulted in improvements.

Time after time, new hoops are erected for sellers to jump through which are described as being necessary to improve buyer confidence in eBay.

The end result is that changes to eBay have been so poorly crafted, miscalculated and ineptly implemented that buyers and sellers stopped coming to eBay entirely out of disgust for what eBay has become.

eBay&#039;s explanation for the outage is nothing more than another poorly crafted, self serving, a$$ covering cover story designed to deflect attention away from the staggeringly incompetent management team.

The unprecedented seller protection, promises of discount coupons, alleged fee refunds for impacted listings etc... is evidence that eBay knows this outage amounts to being the straw that broke the camels back for buyers and sellers alike and they are desperately trying to minimize the damage.

Let&#039;s see if eBay management will fully compensate buyers and sellers as stated, or if once again, buyers and sellers will have to beg and sit pretty to get the compensation that they rightly deserve.

I am betting that there will be widespread problems where eBay attempts to deny feedback withdrawal, listing refunds and buyer coupons to those effected as eBay management seeks to minimize the out of pocket expenses related to making this right.

Any failure by eBay to fully honor the promises of compensation will further illustrate the lack of management credibility and integrity.

Hopefully, when the smoke clears, current management will be swept out the door.

After this incident, this holiday season will likely be the last memory many have of eBay unless new management is brought in to clean up the many issues the current team have created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theories abound as to the cause of the outage.</p>
<p>Was it a listing surge as eBay&#8217;s a$$ covering executives want everyone to believe?</p>
<p>Was it a calculated take down designed to conceal the fact that eBay 2009 4th quarter revenue is already in a serious hole?</p>
<p>Did the insertion of Most Watch code to advertise on seller pages bring the systems down with only normal seasonal listing activity?</p>
<p>Did management forget the holiday selling season starts in November and failed to dedicate sufficient capacity?</p>
<p>Did disgruntled former employees hack the site causing the outage?</p>
<p>Bottom line is eBay&#8217;s management lacks sufficient credibility to have any explanation offered accepted as truth.</p>
<p>John Donahoe and his deficient management team have spun so many tall tales that nothing they say anymore is accepted at face value.</p>
<p>It appears that the eBay board of directors, media and stock analysts are the only ones that buy into the tall tales spun by John Donahoe &amp; his management team.</p>
<p>eBay&#8217;s sales are not down due to the recession as John Donahoe claims. If sales were impacted by the recession, Amazon and a plethora of sites would not be reporting double digit sales increases.</p>
<p>Buyers still do not believe that checks and money orders are insecure methods of payment, and instead have taken their buying activity to other sites.</p>
<p>Buyers have not bought into Donahoe &amp; Co&#8217;s declaration that the destructive innovations imposed across eBay have resulted in improvements.</p>
<p>Time after time, new hoops are erected for sellers to jump through which are described as being necessary to improve buyer confidence in eBay.</p>
<p>The end result is that changes to eBay have been so poorly crafted, miscalculated and ineptly implemented that buyers and sellers stopped coming to eBay entirely out of disgust for what eBay has become.</p>
<p>eBay&#8217;s explanation for the outage is nothing more than another poorly crafted, self serving, a$$ covering cover story designed to deflect attention away from the staggeringly incompetent management team.</p>
<p>The unprecedented seller protection, promises of discount coupons, alleged fee refunds for impacted listings etc&#8230; is evidence that eBay knows this outage amounts to being the straw that broke the camels back for buyers and sellers alike and they are desperately trying to minimize the damage.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see if eBay management will fully compensate buyers and sellers as stated, or if once again, buyers and sellers will have to beg and sit pretty to get the compensation that they rightly deserve.</p>
<p>I am betting that there will be widespread problems where eBay attempts to deny feedback withdrawal, listing refunds and buyer coupons to those effected as eBay management seeks to minimize the out of pocket expenses related to making this right.</p>
<p>Any failure by eBay to fully honor the promises of compensation will further illustrate the lack of management credibility and integrity.</p>
<p>Hopefully, when the smoke clears, current management will be swept out the door.</p>
<p>After this incident, this holiday season will likely be the last memory many have of eBay unless new management is brought in to clean up the many issues the current team have created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tyson Foods Enters Joint Venture in India by ValeryBow</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/3895-tyson-foods-3/comment-page-1#comment-105190</link>
		<dc:creator>ValeryBow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=3895#comment-105190</guid>
		<description>Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium? 
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?<br />
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yamaha India launches Daytona racing kit for its YZF-R15 by wan2</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5394-daytona-yzf-r15/comment-page-1#comment-104915</link>
		<dc:creator>wan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5394#comment-104915</guid>
		<description>how to get daytona racing kit r15 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to get daytona racing kit r15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forbes&#8217; list of 2000 corporate giants has 34 Indian companies by M.Meenakshi sundaram</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/2187-forbes-2000-corporate-giants/comment-page-1#comment-104751</link>
		<dc:creator>M.Meenakshi sundaram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/2187/forbes-2000-corporate-giants/#comment-104751</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
I need all e-mail id&#039;s of corporate companies in india </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I need all e-mail id&#039;s of corporate companies in india</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google, News Corporation, and Rupert Murdoch! by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5776-rupert-murdoch/comment-page-1#comment-104363</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5776#comment-104363</guid>
		<description>Basically, that&#039;s what the paid section is, paying for search engine rankings. And now, they&#039;re going to be charging to be ranked in the default results. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, that&#039;s what the paid section is, paying for search engine rankings. And now, they&#039;re going to be charging to be ranked in the default results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google, News Corporation, and Rupert Murdoch! by operamaniac</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5776-rupert-murdoch/comment-page-1#comment-104362</link>
		<dc:creator>operamaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5776#comment-104362</guid>
		<description>for some reason i do not see any reason for google to offer paid rankings on their search engine result pages.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for some reason i do not see any reason for google to offer paid rankings on their search engine result pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google, News Corporation, and Rupert Murdoch! by Kevin</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5776-rupert-murdoch/comment-page-1#comment-104361</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5776#comment-104361</guid>
		<description>As much as I don&#039;t care for Murdoch and his Fox news clan, there is a ring of truth to that. How do I know? I was told this very same information a few months ago... and it goes like this. 
 
I was told by someone that works at a company that is &quot;Google Certified&quot; (with their seal of approval) to sign up web sites in the &quot;Paid&quot; / &quot;Sponsored&quot; section of the Google search. And he told me that in the near future that Google is going to make their 1st results page of the search engine &quot;Paid&quot;. 
 
What does that mean? That means that if you want to be listed in Google on the 1st page, you&#039;ll have to pay. No longer will search engine optimization, meta-tagging, or any other search engine methods will work on Google.. according to this company. 
 
So, I can believe what Murdoch is saying on this one, and very soon Google will have a lot of webmasters pissed off. 
 
The good news is that Google makes up only less than 28% of the search engines, and getting listed in any web site that&#039;s listed in Google&#039;s 1st page shouldn&#039;t be hard to do. 
 
Kevin 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I don&#039;t care for Murdoch and his Fox news clan, there is a ring of truth to that. How do I know? I was told this very same information a few months ago&#8230; and it goes like this. </p>
<p>I was told by someone that works at a company that is &quot;Google Certified&quot; (with their seal of approval) to sign up web sites in the &quot;Paid&quot; / &quot;Sponsored&quot; section of the Google search. And he told me that in the near future that Google is going to make their 1st results page of the search engine &quot;Paid&quot;. </p>
<p>What does that mean? That means that if you want to be listed in Google on the 1st page, you&#039;ll have to pay. No longer will search engine optimization, meta-tagging, or any other search engine methods will work on Google.. according to this company. </p>
<p>So, I can believe what Murdoch is saying on this one, and very soon Google will have a lot of webmasters pissed off. </p>
<p>The good news is that Google makes up only less than 28% of the search engines, and getting listed in any web site that&#039;s listed in Google&#039;s 1st page shouldn&#039;t be hard to do. </p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AT&amp;T sues Verizon over their 3G map commercial by Ex AT&#38;T Customer</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5764-att-sues-verizon/comment-page-1#comment-104310</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex AT&#38;T Customer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5764#comment-104310</guid>
		<description>Gee AT&amp;T, the truth hurts huh?  If anyone is being deceptive it&#039;s you guys. I wish one of you guys would come out and admit how horrible your 3G coverage in NYC is, at least with the iPhone 3GS and the unbearable dropped calls your users have to suffer through everyday.  Everybody knows that Verizon has the best TOTAL coverage of anyone out there, 3G or otherwise.  THAT IS A FACT.  So rather than wasting your time suing somebody, why don&#039;t you fix the broken network you keep lying about and become a real competitor.  Sheesh!  I know I know....it&#039;s not about the map and that it does accurately show your spotty 3G coverage...it&#039;s about people thinking that they won&#039;t have coverage in non-3G areas, right?  Do you really think people are that stupid?  Well, maybe some but you still have to fix your overworked and unreliable network.  
Still suing? I guess all the credit you refuse to give your frustrated customers (and therefore stealing) isn&#039;t not enough.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee AT&amp;T, the truth hurts huh?  If anyone is being deceptive it&#039;s you guys. I wish one of you guys would come out and admit how horrible your 3G coverage in NYC is, at least with the iPhone 3GS and the unbearable dropped calls your users have to suffer through everyday.  Everybody knows that Verizon has the best TOTAL coverage of anyone out there, 3G or otherwise.  THAT IS A FACT.  So rather than wasting your time suing somebody, why don&#039;t you fix the broken network you keep lying about and become a real competitor.  Sheesh!  I know I know&#8230;.it&#039;s not about the map and that it does accurately show your spotty 3G coverage&#8230;it&#039;s about people thinking that they won&#039;t have coverage in non-3G areas, right?  Do you really think people are that stupid?  Well, maybe some but you still have to fix your overworked and unreliable network.<br />
Still suing? I guess all the credit you refuse to give your frustrated customers (and therefore stealing) isn&#039;t not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fox Business Channel to be launched later this year by Sachin</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/1870-fox-business-channel/comment-page-1#comment-104305</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/1870/fox-business-channel/#comment-104305</guid>
		<description>good to know some reliable channels are joining the crew unlike clutter to the media space. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good to know some reliable channels are joining the crew unlike clutter to the media space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dilip Chhabria designs Hot Nano for Tata Nano owners by Yogendra-Thane</title>
		<link>http://business.techwhack.com/5774-dilip-chhabria/comment-page-1#comment-104302</link>
		<dc:creator>Yogendra-Thane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://business.techwhack.com/?p=5774#comment-104302</guid>
		<description>I own Tata Nano since September 2009 &amp; I am not aware of such company doing customisation for Nano.If they claim they have plenty of orders from existing Nano owners let them clearly publish the specs of such modifications &amp; if these would have any implications on standard warranty of the vehicle.Does Tata Motors approve of such changes during warranty???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own Tata Nano since September 2009 &amp; I am not aware of such company doing customisation for Nano.If they claim they have plenty of orders from existing Nano owners let them clearly publish the specs of such modifications &amp; if these would have any implications on standard warranty of the vehicle.Does Tata Motors approve of such changes during warranty???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
